Antireflective polymer composites with carbon nanomaterials modified by oxygen plasma

This study investigates the properties of epoxy resin reinforced with carbon nanomaterials (graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes “Taunit M” and “Taunit MD”), focusing on their structural and optical characteristics, as well as the effects of atomic oxygen (AO) exposure, which is crucial for the application of such composites in low Earth orbit (LEO) conditions. Exposure to AO in LEO, with an average energy of ~5 eV, leads to the surface erosion of composites, resulting in significant mass loss. Experimental results indicate that the average erosion yield (Rm) is 1.07·10–23 g/atom for the composite with “Taunit M” filler, 1.21·10–23 g/atom for “Taunit MD”, and 8.56·10–24 g/atom for the graphene-filled composite. This effect occurs because carbon fillers undergo the oxidation and chemical sputtering under AO exposure, a typical behavior for materials used in space environments. After irradiation with an AO fluence of (1.7–30.0)1020 atom/cm², a significant decrease in reflection coefficients (both specular and diffuse) is observed across a broad spectral range (0.2–25 µm). Specular reflection decreased by 1.4 times for pure epoxy resin, and by 9.9, 15.8, and 13.6 times for samples filled with graphene, “Taunit M”, and “Taunit MD”, respectively. Diffuse reflection from the pure epoxy decreased by 1.2 times, while for graphene-, “Taunit M”-, and “Taunit MD”-filled samples, it decreased by 5.3, 16.7, and 9.0 times, respectively. These findings indicate that modifying epoxy resin with carbon nanomaterials followed by AO irradiation leads to the formation of a surface layer with high anti-reflective properties. Such materials, treated with low-energy oxygen plasma, are highly effective for use in optical and optoelectronic systems of spacecraft, as well as in terrestrial applications requiring materials with high absorption and low reflection.

1. Banks B. A., de Groh K. K., Miller S. K. Low Earth orbital atomic oxygen interactions with spacecraft materials. MRS Online Proceedings Library, 2004, vol. 851, pp. 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1557/proc851-nn8.1

2. Novikov L. S., Voronina E. N., Chernik V. N., Chirskaya N. P., Zhang W. Study on atomic oxygen exposure and hard particle impact of polyimide nanocomposites. International Journal of Nanoscience, 2020, vol. 19, no. 2, art. 1950007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X19500078

3. Chernik V. N. Atomic oxygen simulation by plasmadynamic accelerator with charge exchange. Proceedings of 7th International Symposium Materials in Space Environment. Toulouse, 1997, SP-399, pp. 237–241.

4. ASTM E2089-00. Standard Practices for Ground Laboratory Atomic Oxygen Interaction Evaluation of Materials for Space Applications, ASTM, 2006. 5 p. https://doi.org/10.1520/e2089-00

5. Vesel A., Primc G., Zaplotnik R., Mozetič M. Applications of highly non-equilibrium low-pressure oxygen plasma for treatment of polymers and polymer composites on an industrial scale. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2020, vol. 62, no. 2, art. 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ab5b50

6. Amorim A. A. P. O., Oliveira M. G., Mancini M. C., Sirqueira A. S. Rheological, EMI and corrosion properties of epoxy coating with nanoparticle and conductive carbon black. SN Applied Sciences, 2021, vol. 3, art. 236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04247-7

7. Gojny F., Wichmann M., Fiedler B., Schulte K. Influence of different carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of epoxy matrix composites – a comparative study. Composites Science and Technology, 2005, vol. 65, no. 15–16, pp. 2300– 2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.021

8. Margoy D., Gouzman I., Grossman E., Bolker A., Eliaz N., Verker R. Epoxy-based shape memory composite for space applications. Acta Astronautica, 2021, vol. 178, pp. 908–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.026

9. Laurenzi S., Clausi M., Zaccardi F., Curt U., Santonicola M. G. Spray coating process of MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposite films for aerospace applications: effects of process parameters on surface electrical properties. Acta Astronautica, 2019, vol. 159, pp. 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.01.043

10. Jiao L., Gu Y., Wang S., Yang Z., Wang H., Li Q., Li M., Zhang Z. Atomic oxygen exposure behaviors of CVD-grown carbon nanotube film and its polymer composite film. Composites. Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2015, vol. 71, pp. 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.008

11. Konstantinov S. V., Komarov F. F., Chizhov I. V., Zaikov V. A., Zhyhulin D. V. The effect of deposition regimes of nanostructured nitride and carbonitride coatings on their structure, optical and electrophysical properties. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Fizika = Journal of the Belarusian State University. Physics, 2024, no. 2, pp. 69–83 (in Russian).

12. Kosynkin D. V., Higginbotham A. L., Sinitskii A., Lomeda J. R., Dimiev A., Price B. K., Tour J. M. Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature, 2009, vol. 458, pp. 872–876. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07872

13. Tennyson R. C. Protection of polymeric materials from atomic oxygen. High Performance Polymers, 1999, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-0083/11/1/013

14. Wang X., Zhao X., Wang M., Shen Z. An experimental study on improving the atomic oxygen resistance of epoxy resin/silica nanocomposites. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2007, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1156–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.20659

15. Ferrari A. C., Robertson J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Physical Review B, 2000, vol. 61, no. 20, art. 14095. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.61.14095