The principle of resonance in the context of modern scientific discourse

The place is determined and the method of substantiating the principle of resonance in the composition of modern scientific discourse is explicated. This principle will enter it, being included in the philosophical foundations of science, where, along with a group of philosophical categories, as a matrix of thinking, a group of philosophical principles and norms of scientific knowledge is distinguished, expressing the fundamental prerequisites and general orientation of cognitive processes (principles of interaction, reproducibility, reflexivity, consistency, determinism, observability, simplicity, etc.).

In this group, the principle of resonance should also be fixed, expressing the orientation of scientific knowledge towards the search for resonant processes and mechanisms of their action in the reality under study and their significance for its adequate intellectual and practical development. It is shown that the principle of resonance (like any regulatory means of cognitive activity that justifies its productivity) in turn must be substantiated. The article explicated two types of its substantiation: cognitive, as a generalization and distribution of any position (idea) in a certain area of cognitive activity (in this case, about the creative significance of resonant processes) to the entire area; practical as a successful practical activity in accordance with the requirements of the substantiated principle in the technical and technological field (construction, radio engineering, instrument making, practical medicine, development of socio-humanitarian technologies, etc.), where the principle of resonance ensures that the scientific discourse is oriented not only to the search for essentially significant resonant processes in the studied reality, but also on the creation of mechanisms for their conscious cultivation, as well as, if necessary, their neutralization. The direct operational inclusion of the resonance principle in cognitive processes is carried out in the context of a rational basis of research, which correlates with historically conditioned types of rationality.

1. Lukashevich V. K. Rational basis of science: the potential of praxeological choice. Vestnik Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Belarusian State Economic University], 2014, no. 1, pp. 99–106 (in Russian).

2. Lukashevich V. K. Creative interaction of subject, normative and reflective knowledge in scientific research. Minsk, 2019. 399 p. (in Russian).

3. Porus V. N. Paradoxical rationality (essays on scientific rationality). Moscow, 1999. 124 p. (in Russian).

4. Rationality at a Crossroads, in 2 books. Moscow, 1999. 368 p. (in Russian).

5. Kasavin I. T. Social philosophy of science and collective epistemology. Moscow, 2016. 264 p. (in Russian).

6. Stepin V. S. Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution. Moscow, 2000. 743 p. (in Russian).

7. Adnoral Natalia. His majesty resonance. Available at: https://www.manwb.ru/articles/science/natural_science/Resonans_NatAdnoral (accessed 23 January 2022) (in Russian).

8. Delyagin N. N. Resonance. Prokhorov A. M. (ed.) Physical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow, 1983, pp. 629 (in Russian).

9. Makeev V. Yu. Stochastic resonance in biosystems. II S’’ezd biofizikov Rossii: v 3 t. [II Congress of biophysicists of Russia: in 3 vol.]. Moscow, 1999. Available at: http://www.library.biophys.msu.ru/gettext?Serial=76150 (accessed 23 January 2022) (in Russian).

10. Anishchenko V. S., Neiman A. B., Moss F., Shimansky-Geier L. Stochastic resonance: noise-enhanced order. Physical-Uspekhi, 1999, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1070/pu1999v042n01abeh000444

11. Fredrickson В. Love 2.0 : how our supreme emotion affects everything we think, do, feel, and become. New York, 2013. 250 p.

12. Roza H. The idea of resonance as a sociological concept. Global’nyy dialog [Global Dialogue], 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 41–44 (in Russian).

13. Roza H. Resonanz. Eine soziologie der weltbeziehung. Berlin, 2016. 816 p. (in German).

14. Gorokhov V. G. The concept of «technology» in the philosophy of technology and the peculiarity of social and humanitarian technologies. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2011, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 110–123 (in Russian).

15. Ivanov V. N., Patrushev V. I. Social technologies. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2004. 488 p. (in Russian).

16. Lukashevich V. K. Forms of cognitive assimilation of resonant processes. Filosofskiye issledovaniya [Philosophical Research], 2022, vol. 9, pp. 193–203 (in Russian).

17. Poincaré H., Pontryagin L. S. (ed.). About science: collection. Moscow, 1983. 560 p. (in Russian).