Reconstruction of damages of the rotary-bicipitale complex at surgical treatment of fractures of the proximal shoulder
https://doi.org/10.29235/1561-8323-2018-62-6-732-738
Abstract
The aim of the work was to improve the results of surgical treatment of patients having fractures of the proximal shoulder with the use of the approaches, including the reposition of bone fragments with adequate osteosynthesis and prevention of impingement syndrome, the reconstruction of all damaged structures of the rotator-bicipitale complex. A score assessment of the treatment results of 512 patients aged from 18 to 87 years old was performed, operated from 2004 to 2018 for the treatment of which the tactical approaches and the methods of surgical treatment developed by the authors aimed at restoring the rotator and bicipital elements were used. The use of the developed tactical approaches and methods made it possible to achieve a favorable outcome of treatment in 503 (98.2 %) patients. Thus, the reconstruction of injuries of the rotatory-bicipital complex is a promising way to improve the results of treatment in patients with fractures of the proximal shoulder.
About the Authors
O. A. Danilenko
Minsk City Clinical Hospital no. 6, Minsk
Belarus
Ph. D. (Medicine), Head of the Department
Belarus
Ph. D. (Medicine), Head of the Department
E. R. Makarevich
Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk
Belarus
D. Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department
Belarus
D. Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department
N. S. Serdyuchenko
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk
Belarus
Corresponding Member, D. Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Academic secretary. Presidium
Belarus
Corresponding Member, D. Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Academic secretary. Presidium
A. V. Malashko
Mogilev Regional Hospital, Mogilev
Belarus
traumatologist
Belarus
traumatologist
References
1. Szyszkowrtz R., Seggl W., Schleifer P., Cundy P. J. Proximal humeral fractures. Management techniques and expected results. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1993, vol. 292, pp. 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199307000-00005
2. Russo R. Surgical treatment of sequelae of fractures of the proximal third of the humerus. The role of osteotomies. La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento, 2005, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 159–169.
3. Flatow E. l., Warner J. J. P., Iannotti J. P. Complex and Revision Problems in Shoulder Surgery. lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2005. 608 р.
4. Neer С. S., Watson k. С., Stanton F. J. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1982, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 319–337. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198264030-00001
5. Nalla R. k., kruzic J. J., kinney J. H., Ritchie R. o. Aspects of in vitro fatigue in human cortical bone: time and cycle dependent crack growth. Biomaterials, 2005, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 2183–2195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.024
6. Machani В., Sinopidis C., Brownson P., Papadopoulos P., Gibson J., Frostick S. P. Mid term results of PlantTan plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Injury, 2006, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. injury.2005.10.003
7. Martin C., Guillen M., lopez G. Treatment of 2- and 3-part fractures of the proximal humerus using external fixation: a retrospective evaluation of 62 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 2006, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17453670610046028
8. Zyto k., kronberg M., Brostrom l. A. Shoulder function after displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 1995, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(95)80016-6
9. Rockwood C. A., Green D. P. Fractures in adults. Philadelphia, lippincott, 2001, vol. l, pp. 997–1040.
10. Hoffmeyer P. The operative management of displaced of fractures of the proximal humerus. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2002, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.13394
Review
Views: 787
Email this article 