On the scientific potential and problem issues of contemporary social and philosophical knowledge

The philosophical basis for studying and modeling social and anthropological processes in the modern globalizing world has been specified (the category of “sociality” has been introduced into scientific discourse, and the epistemological potential of social dialectics has been determined). The picture of social reproduction in a transitional society is revealed. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is determined by the fact that they direct researchers not toward knowledge of external, verbally perceived social phenomena and processes, but toward knowledge of the internal mechanisms of social development that are hidden from external observation, that are comprehended through abstract thinking, and that orient the knowing subject to reflection of sociality in its ontological nature and anthropological essence, historical dynamics, and modern modification. The results obtained can be used to monitor social processes and to identify and resolve social conflicts at their inception, in order to prevent large-scale social upheavals.

1. Belarus in the Context of Global Sociodynamics: A Philosophical Analysis. Minsk, 2022. 408 p. (in Russian).

2. Adulo T. I. A. A. Zinoviev’s “Logical Sociology” is the methodological basis of comprehension of human history. Filosofskie issledovaniya = Philosophical Research, 2023, vol. 10, pp. 78–90 (in Russian).

3. Adulo T. I. Sociality as an object of philosophical comprehension. Filosofskie issledovaniya = Philosophical Research, 2018, vol. 5, pp. 29–49 (in Russian).

4. Bankovskaya Yu. L. Sociocommunicative Features of Conflict Interaction of Network Structures. Minsk, 2022. 212 p. (in Russian).

5. Castells M. Formation of a society of network structures. Novaya postindustrial’naya volna na Zapade. Antologiya [New Post-Industrial Wave in the West. Anthology]. Moscow, 1999, pp. 492–505 (in Russian).

6. Babosov E. M. The Role of Personal Creativity in the Development of a Networked Society. Minsk, 2019. 300 p. (in Russian).

7. Chernysh M. F. Theory of institutional matrices: a critical analysis. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2015, no. 10, pp. 74–83. 83 (in Russian).

8. Kirdina S. G. Institutional matrices and development of Russia: introduction to X-Y theory. Saint Petersburg, 2014. 468 p. (in Russian).

9. Zinoviev A. A. I Dream of a New Person. Moscow, 2007. 240 p. (in Russian).

10. Buzgalin A. V. Marxism as a theoretical prerequisite for sociocultural creativity. Russkaya filosofiya XX veka i ee vklad v mirovuyu intellektual’nuyu traditsiyu. K 100-letiyu «Filosofskogo parokhoda». Tezisy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii: v 2 tomakh [Russian Philosophy of the 20th Century and Its Contribution to the World Intellectual Tradition. On the 100th Anniversary of the “Philosophical Steamship”. Abstracts of the International Conference: in 2 volumes]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, 2022, vol. 1, pp. 231–234 (in Russian).

11. Hegel G. V. F. The Science of Logic: in 3 volumes. Moscow, 1970, vol. 1. 501 p. (in Russian).

12. Hegel G. V. F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences: in 3 volumes. Moscow, 1974, vol. 1. Science of Logic. 452 p. (in Russian).