INFLUENCE OF P16 GENE METHYLATION ON THE RISK OF PROGRESSION OF NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
https://doi.org/10.29235/1561-8323-2018-62-3-322-328
Abstract
To accurately predict the tumor behavior and individualize the treatment approach, new methods for bladder cancer (BC) prognosis are required. The most promising prognostic markers are the mutational and epigenetic changes of genes involved in maintaining cellular homeostasis. In the present study, we evaluated the influence of p16 promoter hypermethylation on the risk of recurrence, progression and disease outcome in the group of 158 BC patients. p16 epigenetic changes were found in 11.4 % of urothelial carcinomas and did not depend on clinicоmorphological characteristics. However, in the subgroup of patients with non-muscle invasive tumors, p16 abnormal methylation was significantly associated with smoking, and in the subgroup of patients with muscle-invasive BC, it was linked to a high tumor grade (G3). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, p16 promoter hypermethylation was an independent predictor for bladder cancer progression (HR 6.84; 95 % CI 1.6–29.9; р = 0.011). The use of the data on the p16 methylation status may improve the accuracy of prognosis of the bladder cancer clinical course and the selection of appropriate treatment strategy.
About the Authors
M. P. SmalRussian Federation
Smal Marharyta Petrovna – Ph. D. (Biology), Senior researcher.
27, Akademicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk.
N. V. Nikitchenko
Russian Federation
Nikitchenko Nataliya Vasilievna – Researcher.
27, Akademicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk.
A. I. Rolevich
Russian Federation
Rolevich Alexander Igorevich – Ph. D. (Medicine), Leading researcher.
223040, Lesnoy, Minsk region, Minsk district.
T. I. Nabebina
Russian Federation
Nabebina Tatiana Ivanovna – Ph. D. (Medicine), Doctor.
223040, Lesnoy, Minsk region, Minsk district.
S. A. Krasny
Russian Federation
Krasny Sergey Anatolievich – Corresponding Member, D. Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Deputy Director.
223040, Lesnoy, Minsk region, Minsk district.
R. I. Goncharova
Russian Federation
Goncharova Roza Iosifovna – D. Sc. (Biology), Professor, Head of the Laboratory.
27, Akademicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk.
References
1. Okeanov A. E., Moiseev P. I., Levin L. F. Cancer Statistics in the Republic of Belarus (2004–2013). Minsk, Republican Scientific and Practical Center of Oncology and Medical Radiology, 2014. 382 p. (in Russian).
2. Enokida H., Nakagawa M. Epigenetics in bladder cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-008-0811-1
3. Kopnin B. P. Targets of Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors: Key for Understanding Basic Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis. Biochemistry, 2000, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 2–27.
4. Krajnoviс M., Radojkovic M., Davidovic R., Dimitrijevic B., Krtolica K. Prognostic signifi cance of epigenetic inactivation of p16, p15, MGMT and DAPK genes in follicular lymphoma. Medical Oncology, 2013, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0441-3
5. Hinrichsen I., Kemp M., Peveling-Oberhag J., Passmann S., Plotz G., Zeuzem S., Brieger A. Promoter methylation of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and p16 is a phenomenon of advanced-stage HCCs. PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. e84453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084453
6. Dominguez G., Silva J., Garcia J. M., Silva J. M., Rodriguez R., Muñoz C., Chacón I., Sanchez R., Carballido J., Colás A., España P., Bonilla F. Prevalence of aberrant methylation of p14ARF over p16INK4a in some human primary tumors. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2003, vol. 530, no. 1–2, pp. 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(03)00133-7
7. Rocco J. W., Sidransky D. p16(MTS-1/CDKN2/INK4a) in cancer progression. Experimental Cell Research, 2001, vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.2000.5149
8. Zöchbauer-Müller S., Fong K. M., Virmani A. K., Geradts J., Gazdar A. F., Minna J. D. Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Research, 2001, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 249–255.
9. Serizawa R. R., Ralfkiaer U., Steven K., Lam G. W., Schmiedel S., Schüz J., Hansen A. B., Horn T., Guldberg P. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of bladder cancer reveals an additive diagnostic value of FGFR3 mutations and hypermethylation events. International Journal of Cancer, 2011, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25651
10. Friedrich M. G., Chandrasoma S., Siegmund K. D., Weisenberger D. J., Cheng J. C., Toma M. I., Huland H., Jones P. A., Liang G. Prognostic relevance of methylation markers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. European Journal of Cancer, 2005, vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 2769–2778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.07.019
11. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature, 2014, vol. 507, no. 7492, pp. 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12965
12. Qi D., Li J., Jiang M., Liu C., Hu Y., Li M., Su J., Que B., Ji W. The relationship between promoter methylation of p16 gene and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2015, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 20701–20711.
13. Marsit C. J., Karagas M. R., Danaee H., Liu M., Andrew A., Schned A., Nelson H. H., Kelsey K. T. Carcinogen exposure and gene promoter hypermethylation in bladder cancer. Carcinogenesis, 2006, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgi172
14. Jarmalaite S., Jankevicius F., Kurgonaite K., Suziedelis K., Mutanen P., Husgafvel-Pursiainen K. Promoter hypermethylation in tumour suppressor genes shows association with stage, grade and invasiveness of bladder cancer. Oncology, 2008, vol. 75, no. 3–4, pp. 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1159/000158665
15. Catto J. W., Azzouzi A. R., Rehman I., Feeley K. M., Cross S. S., Amira N., Fromont G., Sibony M., Cussenot O., Meuth M., Hamdy F. C. Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in transitional cell carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 2903–2910. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.163